
Quality or Timing, which one is more important? Depends; every project doesn’t demand the same priority. Every client doesn’t have the same mentality. Some want their product in time; they can consider product quality up to some mark. Some companies wish to’ sound quality in their product. They are not very strict with timing, but don’t want to consider quality. I prefer the last one. It doesn’t mean the project will be in a never-ending process. In some cases, it might be. When clients want their product updated over time.
In Bangladesh, most companies emphasize deadlines. That’s the nature of our clients. But when I started working with Europeans, I found they put pressure on quality.
When I work, if I have more than enough time, I can do work much better than expected. First, I do what was expected, then I get more time to think about how to improve that, and I do…. And my relaxed brain can feel much better than under pressure.
Under pressure, I can work. Just there won't be any room to change or upgrade.
1 comment:
Quality of course...I'm advertiser and I work with a lot of marketings campaings, my last client was AUDI cars, and yeah sometimes your dead line its to shorth, but for me quality is allways first.
But sometimes if you are working under preasure, the result is better, i don know why.
Greetings from Australia
Post a Comment